Beery v. Chandler et al
Plaintiff: Rhoderick Beery, III
Defendant: Robert Chandler, Baker, Sterchi, Cowden & Rice, LLC and Jeffrey Roper
Case Number: 4:2014cv00456
Filed: March 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Jean C. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Jeffrey Roper's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss his Counterclaim without Prejudice (ECF No. 73) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Jeffrey Roper's Motion to Compel (ECF No . 55) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Jeffrey Roper's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 57) is DENIED as MOOT.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant Jeffrey Roper's Motion to Extend. Deadline to File Reply to his Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 74) is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 4/27/15. (JWJ)
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss its Cause of Action without Prejudice (ECF No. 49 ) is GRANTED. Defendant Roper's counterclaim remains pending before this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Rhoderick Beery, Ill's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Jeffrey Roper (ECF No. 64 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on April 3, 2015. (BRP)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim of Defendant Roper as Claim is Against Public Policy (ECF No. 30) is DENIED. re: 30 MOTION to Dismiss :Counterclaim filed by Defendant Roper filed by Counter Defendant Rhoderick Beery, III. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/20/15. (JWJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beery v. Chandler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Chandler
Represented By: Justin L. Assouad
Represented By: Gerard T. Noce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Baker, Sterchi, Cowden & Rice, LLC
Represented By: Justin L. Assouad
Represented By: Gerard T. Noce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Roper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhoderick Beery, III
Represented By: Christopher S. Swiecicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?