Harrell et al v. Boeing Co., The, et al
| James Harrell and Edna Harrell |
| Boeing Co., The, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation, Crane Co., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, General Electric Company, Georgia Pacific, LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, J.P. Bushnell Packing Supply Co., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Trane U.S., Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, United Technologies Corporation, Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Young Group Ltd. and Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. |
| General Electric Company |
| General Electric Company, Boeing Co., The, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation, Crane Co., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Georgia Pacific, LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Edna Harrell, James Harrell, Honeywell International, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, J.P. Bushnell Packing Supply Co., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Trane U.S., Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, United Technologies Corporation, Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Young Group Ltd. and Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. |
| 4:2014cv00479 |
| March 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any remaining defendant objecting to the Court granting plaintiffs' amended motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice [#117] shall show cause in writing by noon on March 24 , 2015, why the motion for dismissal should not be granted. Failure to file a timely objection will result in the Court granting plaintiffs' motion without further notice by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any defendant with a pending cr ossclaim who objects to the dismissal of that crossclaim without prejudice upon the granting of plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice must show cause in writing by noon on March 24, 2015, why the crossclaims should not be dismissed. Any such objection shall also state the asserted basis of the Court's subject matter jurisdiction over its crossclaim. If a defendant with a pending crossclaim does not file an objection in compliance with this Show Cause Order by noon on March 24, 2015, the Court will construe the lack of an objection as a request for dismissal of its crossclaim without prejudice in the event that plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that fa ilure to file a timely objection in compliance with this Order to Show Cause will result in the Court granting plaintiffs' amended notice of voluntary dismissal [#117], dismissing all pending claims and crossclaims without prejudice (each par ty to bear its own costs), and closing this case without further notice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' first motion for voluntary dismissal [#116] is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on March 17, 2015. (MCB) Modified on 3/17/2015 (MCB).
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Whittaker's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction [# 66 ] is granted without opposition, and defendant Whittaker is dismissed from this action without prejudice. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that defendants Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. and Goodrich Corp. are dismissed without prejudice for plaintiffs' failure to timely obtain service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall show cause in w riting within 10 days of the date of this Order why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice in its entirety for plaintiffs' failure to comply with my August 12, 2014 Memorandum and Order. If plaintiffs request that the Court not dismiss this action, then their response to this Memorandum and Order to Show Cause shall include a status report as required by my August 12, 2014 Memorandum and Order. Failure to timely comply with this Memorandum and Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice without further notice or Order from this Court. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on August 26, 2014. (Show Cause Response due by 9/5/2014.) (BRP)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Union Carbide's motion [# 77 ] is granted in part only as follows: this Court will institute denials under Rule 5(c)(1)(B) and order that any crossclaim, counterclaim, avoidance, or affirmative defense in those pleadings and replies to them will be treated as denied or avoided by all other parties; and, all defendants are granted leave to file any counterclaim or crossclaim by September 12, 2014. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on August 22, 2014. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file a status report and comply with the other provisions of this Memorandum and Order as set out above by August 25, 2014.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Bushnell shall either seek leave to file aresponsive pleading out of time within five (5) days of the date of this Order, or plaintiffs shall move for entry of default and default judgment as set out above by August 25, 2014. Response to Court due by 8/25/2014. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on August 12, 2014. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (read order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for joinder [# 14 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions [# 9 , # 10 , # 11 , # 18 ] are denied in part and denied without prejudice in part as set out above. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 04/01/2014. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
