Erler et al. v Graham Packaging Company, LP
| Brenda Erler, Ricky Gilmore, Violet Grant, Kevin Guion, Kevin Hake, Michael J. Hannekan, Sandy Hartman, Sam Kincade, Yvette Stephens, Calvin Stokes and Janet Young |
| Graham Packaging Company, L.P. and District 9, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers |
| 4:2014cv00931 |
| May 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant District 9, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workerss Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Graham Packaging Company L.P.s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 55 ) is GRANTED. A separate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 8/10/15. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant District 9's Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 14 ), is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Graham Packaging Company, L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 19 ), is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/17/2014. (CLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
