Mayer v. Chambers et al
| Michael Mayer |
| Unknown Chambers, John Doe Officers, Jefferson County Police Officers and Jailers |
| 4:2014cv01356 |
| August 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to be issued upon the amended complaint [Docs. # 31 and # 34 ] as to defendants Robert Kern and Billy Clouse in their individual capacities. FURTHER ORDERED tha t pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1997e(g)(2), all defendants shall reply to the amended complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 04/30/2015. (CLK)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended complaint at this time.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a written supplementto his amended complaint within thi rty (30) days from the date of this Order,stating whether he is suing the named defendants in their official capacity,individual capacity, or both individual and official capacities, in accordance with the specific instructions set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to supplement his amended complaint in accordance with this Court's instructions will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice to him. Response to Court due by 4/27/2015. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 3/27/15. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM AND ORDERIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 13 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 12/4/14. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $2.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of th is Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall attempt iss ue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendant Unknown Chambers, an officer with the Jefferson County Police Department. FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendant Unknown Chambers shall reply t o plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants "John Doe Officers," Jefferson County Police Officers," and "Ja ilers," are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard.( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 10/30/2014.). Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 10/01/2014. cc:finance(CLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
