Scott v. United States of America

Scott v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Hagi Scott
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	4:2014cv01512
Filed:	September 2, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge:	Jean C. Hamilton
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 23, 2016	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Hagi Scotts Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (ECF No. 1) is DENIED, and that his claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. A n Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motions for Leave to Amend his Petition (ECF Nos. 8, 9) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 7) is D ENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). 7 9 8 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 5/23/16. (CLA)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 23, 2016

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Hagi Scotts Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (ECF No. 1) is DENIED, and that his claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. A n Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motions for Leave to Amend his Petition (ECF Nos. 8, 9) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 7) is D ENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). 7 9 8 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 5/23/16. (CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Hagi Scott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Tiffany G. Becker(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?