Crouch v. Bussen Quarries, Inc. et al
| Paul A Crouch |
| Bussen Quarries, Inc., Charles A. Whobey, Jerry Younger, George J. Westley, Marvin Kropp, Arthyr H. Bunte, Jr., Gary F. Caldwell, Ronald DeStefano and Greg R. May |
| 4:2014cv01733 |
| October 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment [#50] is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on November 16, 2015. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment [# 29 ] by defendants Arthyr H. Bunte, Jr., Gary F. Caldwell, Ronald DeStefano, Marvin Kropp, Greg R. May, George J. Westley, Charles A. Whobey, and J erry Younger is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Defendant Bussen Quarries, Inc.' s motion to dismiss Count II [# 21 ] is granted and its motion for hearing [# 41 ] is denied as moot. Plaintiff Paul Crouch's motion to amend his complaint [# 44 ] is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. A separate judgment in accord with the Memorandum and Order is issued today. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/19/2015. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
