Dovin v. Reddy et al
| Jonathan Paul Dovin |
| Verra Reddy and Jay Englehart |
| 4:2015cv01259 |
| August 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to issue process on the complaint in compliance with the Court's agreement with the State of Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's second motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot, as plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the Memorandum and Order of September 3, 2015. [Doc. 6].. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/21/2015. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a civil rights complaint form. IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended complaint by October 5, 2015. If plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will summarily dismiss this case without prejudice and without further notice to plaintiff. ( Response to Court due by 10/5/2015.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/3/2015. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
