Spiridon v. USA

Spiridon v. USA

Petitioner:	Daniela M. Spiridon
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	4:2015cv01380
Filed:	September 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	John A. Ross
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 30, 2018	Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Movant Daniela Spiridon's motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence are DENIED. (Doc. Nos. 1 , 39 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability as Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/30/2018. (CLO)
October 10, 2017	Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the evidentiary hearings on October 12, 2017, and October 20, 2017, will address what the Court believes to be material issues of fact that cannot be resolved or refuted by the record with respect to Petitioner's claims that defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by (1) failing to review and advise Petitioner regarding the deed agreement that she submitted to the Probation Office, (2) failing to investigate the Gover nment's allegation that Petitioner forged the deed agreement, which violated her plea agreement, and (3) advising Petitioner to concede the alleged forgery in exchange for the Government's agreement that the total loss was less than $2.5 million.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/10/2017. (CLO)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 30, 2018

Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Movant Daniela Spiridon's motions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence are DENIED. (Doc. Nos. 1 , 39 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability as Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/30/2018. (CLO)

October 10, 2017

Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the evidentiary hearings on October 12, 2017, and October 20, 2017, will address what the Court believes to be material issues of fact that cannot be resolved or refuted by the record with respect to Petitioner's claims that defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by (1) failing to review and advise Petitioner regarding the deed agreement that she submitted to the Probation Office, (2) failing to investigate the Gover nment's allegation that Petitioner forged the deed agreement, which violated her plea agreement, and (3) advising Petitioner to concede the alleged forgery in exchange for the Government's agreement that the total loss was less than $2.5 million.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/10/2017. (CLO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spiridon v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Richard E. Finneran(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Robert F. Livergood(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Julia M. Wright(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniela M. Spiridon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?