Seko v. Colvin

Plaintiff: John Jude Seko
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2015cv01669
Filed: November 5, 2015
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Franklin
Referring Judge: Shirley P. Mensah
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Black Lung Cases
Cause of Action: 42:1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 7, 2017 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated January 19, 2017 20 is adopted in its entirety. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/7/17. (CAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seko v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Jude Seko
Represented By: Ken J. Ryno
Represented By: Sidney J. Zeller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Nicholas P. Llewellyn(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?