Lucas v. Lawrence

Lucas v. Lawrence

Petitioner:	Paul E. Lucas
Respondent:	Scott Lawrence
Case Number:	4:2016cv00142
Filed:	February 3, 2016
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 16, 2016	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM: This matter is before the Court on the petition of Paul Lucas for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because the petition fails to state a cognizable claim for habeas relief and is untimely, the Court will dismiss it without further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/16/16. (JAB)
March 4, 2016	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must show cause in writing, not later than twenty-one (21) days from the da te of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERD that if petitioner fails to respond to this Order, the petition will be dismissed without further notice. ( Show Cause Response due by 3/25/2016.). Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/4/16. (KKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 16, 2016

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM: This matter is before the Court on the petition of Paul Lucas for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Because the petition fails to state a cognizable claim for habeas relief and is untimely, the Court will dismiss it without further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/16/16. (JAB)

March 4, 2016

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must show cause in writing, not later than twenty-one (21) days from the da te of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERD that if petitioner fails to respond to this Order, the petition will be dismissed without further notice. ( Show Cause Response due by 3/25/2016.). Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/4/16. (KKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lucas v. Lawrence
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Paul E. Lucas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Lawrence
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke(Designation State / Local Government)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?