Bauer et al v. Lauth et al
| Donald W. Bauer, Lauretta D. Bauer, Karla Dale Bauer and David W. Bauer |
| Betty A. Lauth, Carol Heilman, Rose Zimmer, Ralph F. Bauer, Ruth Smith, Mary Jane Klitzing, Mary Jane Klitzing - Executrix, Stephen R. Ryan, Ryan, Bennett, and Radloff, Edward T. Graham, Jr., Beavers, Graham, and Calvert, First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust, Doug Kopplin and Unknown Employee and/or employees of First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust |
| 4:2016cv00410 |
| March 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Within US but Outside District |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Stephen Ryan and Ryan, Bennett & Radloff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 19] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Edward T. Graham, Jr. and Beavers, Graham & Calvert's motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matt er jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 22] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust, National Association's motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 25] IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that defendants First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust, National Association, Doug Kopplin, Unknown Employee and/or Unknown Employees of First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust, and Mary Jane Klitzing's motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 27] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Betty A. Lauth, Carol Heilman, Rose Zimmer, Ralph F. Bauer, Ruth Smith, and Mary Jane Klitzing as Executrix for the Estate of Paul C. Bauer's motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 29] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Stephen Ryan and Ryan, Bennett & Radloff's motion for sanctions is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiffs are barred from filing any further pro se pleadings with this C ourt that relate to the foreclosure proceedings that took place in Illinois state court, without prior approval of this Court. [Doc. 37] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs David W. Bauer, Donald W. Bauer, Karla Dale Bauer, and Lauretta D. Bauer's for "Motion to Request Leave of Court to Allow the Filing of the Response to All of the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss,'" which the Court construes as a motion for leave to file their over-length memorandum in respo nse to defendants' motions to dismiss out of time, is GRANTED. [Doc. 35] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs David W. Bauer, Donald W. Bauer, Karla Dale Bauer, and Lauretta D. Bauer's "Motion for Leave to File All Four Pro S e Plaintiffs' Joint Response," which the Court construes as a motion for leave to file a surresponse to the motion for sanctions, is DENIED. [Doc. 42] An appropriate Order of Dismissal will accompany this memorandum and order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/14/2016. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
