Chura et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Gary Chura and Nicole Chura
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Jerry Amos, John Doe and Jason Kem
Case Number: 4:2016cv00872
Filed: June 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: Ronnie L. White
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Remand (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall REMAND this case to the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, from which it was removed. An Order of Remand accompanies this Order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/27/16. (CLA)
September 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Text Only Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition (ECF No. 20 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. shall file a sur-reply to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand no later than September 21, 2016. Dated this 7th day of September, 2016. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 09/07/2016. (KCB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chura et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Nicole C. Behnen
Represented By: Michael O. Fawaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Amos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Kem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Chura
Represented By: Ryan R. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Chura
Represented By: Ryan R. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?