Wesley v. USA
Petitioner: Jamie Wesley
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2016cv01111
Filed: June 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Jamie Wesley's Motion to Vacate [ECF No. 1] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 3/9/17. (EAB)
July 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to forward a copy of movants § 2255 motion to the Office of the Public Defender for the Eastern District of Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Public Defende r shall notify this Court, within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, whether it will be pursuing movants arguments under Johnson, either by filing a written notice in this action of their intent not to represent movant , or by filing an amended motion to vacate, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, also in this action, or a request in the Court of Appeals for leave to bring a successive § 2255 motion, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) (3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall hold this matter in abeyance for forty-five (45) days. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 7/11/16. (EAB) (Copy of Order sent to U.S. Probation on 7/11/16). (EAB).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?