White et al v. Ameristep, Inc.
Jeffrey White and Amber White |
Ameristep Corporation, Primal Vantage Company, Inc. and BRW Distribution Corporation |
4:2016cv01216 |
July 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Jefferson |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Whites motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (#51) is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Whites motion to compel discovery (#46) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pl aintiff Whites motion to extend scheduling order deadlines (#52) is GRANTED, consistent with the Second Amended Case Management Order that the Court will file.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by January 12, 2018, plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint that alleges defendants principal places of business. ( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 1/12/2018.). Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/22/17. (MRS) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by August 23,2016, plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint which shall allege defendants' principal places of business. Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 8/23/2016. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/2/16. (CSG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.