Mahone v. Prudden

Mahone v. Prudden

Petitioner:	Michael A. Mahone
Respondent:	Douglas Prudden
Case Number:	4:2016cv01870
Filed:	November 28, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Henry Edward Autrey
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 9, 2017	Filing 10 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. An Order of Dismissal will be filed forthwith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/9/17. (KJS)
January 3, 2017	Filing 6 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a § 2254 form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must fill out the § 2254 form and return it to the Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. The form must address only one state court judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to challenge other judgments, he must request additional forms from the Clerk.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 5] is MOOT. He has paid the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. 5 5] ( Response to Court due by 1/26/2017.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/3/17. CC: Form mailed.(CLA)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 9, 2017

Filing 10 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. An Order of Dismissal will be filed forthwith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/9/17. (KJS)

January 3, 2017

Filing 6 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a § 2254 form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must fill out the § 2254 form and return it to the Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. The form must address only one state court judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to challenge other judgments, he must request additional forms from the Clerk.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 5] is MOOT. He has paid the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. 5 5] ( Response to Court due by 1/26/2017.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/3/17. CC: Form mailed.(CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mahone v. Prudden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael A. Mahone
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Douglas Prudden
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?