Carr v. Joyce
||December 1, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - City
||Stephen N. Limbaugh
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 21, 2016
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 4 MOTION to Dismiss :for Violation of Statutory and Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial filed by Plaintiff Adrian Carr, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) filed by Plaintiff Ad rian Carr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $31.45 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his inmate registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is f or an original proceeding.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint and all of his causes of action against defendant are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at plaintiff's motion to dismiss for violation of statutory and constitutional right to speedy trial (Docket No. 4) is DENIED as moot. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. (Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 1/20/2017.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/21/16. (CSG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?