Wallace v. Osmer et al
Karen Wallace |
Nicolas Osmer, St. Louis County Police Department, Florissant Police Department and Unknown Officers |
4:2017cv01248 |
April 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Catherine D. Perry |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, or alternatively, to file an amended complaint [ECF No. 10 ] is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 7/20/17. (EAB) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 4/13/2017. (NEB) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a civil complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended complaint on the Court-provided form within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order (Amended Pleadings due by 4/26/2017). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/5/17. (CAR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.