Roeslein & Associates, Inc. et al v. Elgin et al
| Roeslein & Associates, Inc. and Roeslein Alternative Energy, LLC |
| Thomas Elgin, Elgin Meyer Bioenergy Co. and J.S. Meyer Engineering, P.C. |
| 4:2017cv01351 |
| April 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| John M. Bodenhausen |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Meyer Defendants' Motion to Stay 150 is Denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay of this case previously imposed 135 is Lifted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Meyer Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration or Certification for Interlocutory Appeal 151 is Denied. The case will be set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference by separate Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 11/27/19. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
135
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant proceedings are stayed as to Defendant Thomas Elgin pending resolution of Defendant Thomas Elgin's bankruptcy until such time as the bankruptcy proceedings have been concluded or Court action is otherwise required. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 1/23/19. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
131
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 105 , 85 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Meyer Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 85) and M&K's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 105) are GRANTED IN PART and DEN IED IN PART as follows: 1. The motions to dismiss are GRANTED as to Count II, and the motions to dismiss are DENIED as to Counts I, III, and VI. 2. Plaintiffs' claim for declaratory judgment of ownership of 420 patent application in Count II is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will issue an appropriate order of Partial Dismissal in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The case will be set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference by separate Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 1/15/19. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Meyer Defendants' Request for Oral Argument on Their Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 101 ) and M&K's Request for Oral Argument on its Motion to Dismiss the First Ame nded Complaint (ECF No. 113 ) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument is set in this matter for Wednesday, October 3, 2018, in Courtroom 15 South at 10:00 a.m. ( Motion Hearing set for 10/3/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom 15S before Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen.). Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 9/11/2018. (NEP)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Their Amended Complaint (ECF No. 40 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts I-II and Counts IV-VI, and the motion is DENIED as to Count III. 2. Plaintiffs' claim for a constructive trust is DISMISSED. 3. Plaintiffs shall file a First Amended Complaint that is consistent with this Memorandum and Order on or before March 19, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that t his Court will issue an appropriate order of Partial Dismissal in accordance with this Memorandum and Order after Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Elgin's Motion to Dismiss and for More Defi nite Statement (ECF No. 29 ), and Meyer Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 45 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Request to Take Judicial Notice (ECF No. 71 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 3/2/18. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bridget L. Halquist's Motion for In-Person, Ex Parte Hearing on the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (ECF No. 66) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel and Elgin shall appear on Friday, November 3, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 15 South for the ex parte hearing.. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 10/26/17. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Elgin's attorneys shall state, in writing and filed under seal and ex parte no later than October 10, 2017, the specific nature of the "professional considerations that requirethe termination of representation" such as they have been discharged by Elgin, see Rule 4-16(a)(3); believe that their representation of the defendant has been rendered unreasonably difficult as a result of defendant's actions, see Rule 4-16(b)(6); or if other good cause for withdrawal exists. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the attorneys shall also file an affidavit from Elgin wherein Elginavers that he consents to his attorneys withdrawing their representation and that he is aware of the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order and the pending motions in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 9/28/2017. (CAR)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Thomas Elgin's Second Motion forExtension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint 21 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 5/19/17. (CAR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
