Margulis v. Probity Brothers, LLC et al
Marilyn Margulis |
Probity Brothers, LLC, Matthew T. Brown and John Does 1-10 |
Assure Call, LLC |
4:2017cv01355 |
April 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
John M Bodenhausen |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 34 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice by Defendants Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 33 STIPULATION Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Third Party Plaintiffs Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 32 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen: Rule 16 Conference held on 10/4/2017. Conference held in person. CMO to issue. (FTR Gold Operator initials:n/a) (FTR Gold: No) (LGK) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 29 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Defendants Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 28 Consent MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Conference by Plaintiff Marilyn Margulis. (Margulis, Max) |
![]() |
Filing 26 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marilyn Margulis of John Does 1-10 without prejudice (Margulis, Max) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 22 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default against Third-Party Defendant Assure Call, LLC [ECF No. 20] is GRANTED, and the default of said Third-Party Defendant is hereby entered. (LGK) |
Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Probity Brothers, LLC, Matthew T. Brown. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 20 MOTION for Entry of Clerk's Default against Third-Party Defendant Assure Call, LLC by Third Party Plaintiffs Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Party Assure Call, LLC by Third Party Plaintiffs Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Probity Brothers, LLC, Matthew T. Brown. Assure Call, LLC served on 6/14/2017, answer due 7/5/2017. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 17 STATUS REPORT Plaintiff Marilyn Margulis and Defendants Probity Brothers, LLC and Matthew T. Brown's Joint Status Report Regarding Service of Assure Call, LLC by Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Summons Issued as to defendant Assure Call, LLC. The summons was mailed to counsel for defendant's, Jeffrey Klaus. (LGK) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Third Party Plaintiffs Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC Process Server: Meredith Harmon (Attachments: #1 Summons on a Third-Party Complaint)(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
![]() |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION to Stay Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan and by Defendants Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC, Third Party Plaintiffs Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Klaus, Jeffrey) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/17/2017: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (CAR). |
Filing 13 NOTICE by Third Party Plaintiffs Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC re #12 Third Party Complaint, Certificate of Mailing (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 12 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against third party defendant Assure Call, LLC No Summons(es) issued, Waivers issued Yes, Consents issued Not yet, YesDemand,, filed by Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
![]() |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Matthew T. Brown.(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Probity Brothers, LLC.(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC Sent To: State Court - Executed (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401. (CSAW) |
Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Marilyn Margulis.(BAK) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Peter C. Sullivan for Defendants Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Sullivan, Peter) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Probity Brothers, LLC.. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Jeffrey Clayton Klaus for Defendants Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 17SL-CC00935, with receipt number 0865-5916189, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Matthew T. Brown, Probity Brothers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.