Robinson v. Glass
| Hosea Lee Robinson |
| Dale Glass |
| 4:2017cv01628 |
| June 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Patricia L. Cohen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, filed on the court form, is DENIED as moot. [ECF No. 28 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to file a civil complaint against his criminal case, the State of Missouri, and Dale Glass is DENIED. [ECF No. 29 ]. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 11/15/2017. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to treat his motion for writ of mandamus as an amended § 2241 application for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. # 23 ] is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motions for writ of mandamus and for relief brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 based on violations of speedy trial in his state criminal case [Doc. # 21 and # 22 ] are DENIED and DISMISSED without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for hearing [Doc. # 24 ] 1s DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 09/28/2017. (KCB)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order of Dismissal [Doc. # 13 ] is VACATED and this matter is REOPENED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for discovery and for forms [Doc. # 16 ] is GRANTED IN PART. The Clerk s hall provide petitioner with copies of the § 2241 habeas corpus form and the § 1983 complaint form. Petitioner may file a separate civil rights action if he chooses to do so. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motions for dismis sal of all criminal charges [Doc. # 17 and # 18 ] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for hearing and for appointment of counsel [Doc. # 19 ] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that peti tioner's amended petition, drafted on a court provided form, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is due to the Court no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. Petitioner's failure to comply with this Court's Order will result in a dismissal of this action. (Case reopened.). Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/21/2017. (Copies of §2241 habeas corpus form and the § 1983 complaint form were mailed to petitioner.) (NEB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Glass | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Hosea Lee Robinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Dale Glass | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Garvin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
