Brown et al v. Taylor
| Jerome Julius Brown and Alexus Brown |
| Andrew Taylor |
| 4:2017cv02249 |
| August 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Within US but Outside District |
| Nannette A. Baker |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send plaintiffs a copy of the Courts civil complaint form and two copies of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis form and financial affidavits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs must file an amended complaint on the Courts form within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Both plaintiffs must sign the amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than twenty-one (21) days of the date of this O rder, plaintiffs must either pay the $400 filing fee or submit separate motions to proceed in forma pauperis. If plaintiffs do not comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further notice. (Amended Complaint due by 9/5 /2017. Filing Fee or IFP Motions due by 9/5/2017.) (A copy of the Courts civil complaint form and two copies of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis form and financial affidavits attached hereto this order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 8/15/17. (KJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
