Nappier v. Lichter et al
| Patricia A. Nappier |
| Roy L. Lichter, Phillip M. Hess, Joseph L. Goff, Jr. and Lawrence E. Mooney |
| 4:2017cv02580 |
| October 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Francois |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this action [Doc. # 10 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for temporary restraining order [Doc. # 9 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/23/17. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
7
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs complaint shall be DISMISSED as frivolous, malicious or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motions for appointment of counsel and for injunctive relief [Doc. #5 and #6] are DENIED AS MOOT. 6 5 2 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/17/17. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
