Johns v. McFerron et al
| Brent J. Johns |
| Unknown McFerron, Henry Moore, Unknown Brown, River City Casino Owners, Missouri Highway Patrol, Federal Gaming Commission, Dale Montgomery, Jr. and Unknown Employees |
| 4:2017cv02762 |
| November 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.84 within thirty (30) da ys of the date of this Order......IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending final disposition of the criminal charges, as well as plaintiff's probationary process, any appeals and post-conviction remed ies, in State v. Johns, No. 16SL-CR00718-01 (21st Judicial Circuit, St. Louis County Court). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for counsel [Doc. 3] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this c ase is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending final disposition of the criminal charges against plaintiff, and may be reopened by this Court.( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 2/23/2018.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 1/24/2018. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
