Hester v. Ramey
Edison Hester |
Eileen Ramey |
4:2018cv00845 |
June 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - City |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Petitioner Edison Hester. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability (Docket No. 17) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/11/19. (CSG) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) filed by Petitioner Edison Hester. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Edison Hester's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED as time-barred. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/17/19. (CSG) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION to Produce filed by Petitioner Edison Hester, 8 MOTION for Extension of: Time to Respond to Order Show Cause filed by Petitioner Edison Hester. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's "Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Order Show Cause" (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have an additional thirty (30) days from the date of this order to respond to the Court's September 24, 2018 order to show cause. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that petitioner's "Motion for Immediate Orders to Produce Records in Order to Respond to Order Show Cause" (Docket No. 9) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. (Show Cause Response due by 11/19/2018.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/19/18. (CSG) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Edison Hester. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pe titioner shall show cause, no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order, why this action should not be summarily dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. (Show Cause Response due by 10/15/2018.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/24/18. (CSG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hester v. Ramey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Edison Hester | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Eileen Ramey | |
Represented By: | Stephen D. Hawke(Designation Assistant US Attorney) |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.