Mills v. Amphenol Corporation
Plaintiff: James N. Mills
Defendant: Amphenol Corporation
Intervenor Plaintiff: TTM Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2018cv01067
Filed: July 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: John M Bodenhausen
Referring Judge: Catherine D Perry
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2018 Filing 8 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
July 2, 2018 Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by James N. Mills. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(BAK)
July 2, 2018 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, Exhibit A - State Court File by Defendant Amphenol Corporation. (Lemley, Gregg)
July 2, 2018 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Amphenol Corporation. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: yes,. (Lemley, Gregg)
July 2, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Amphenol Corporation Sent To: Plaintiff (Lemley, Gregg)
July 2, 2018 Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Gregg M. Lemley for Defendant Amphenol Corporation. (Lemley, Gregg)
July 2, 2018 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Cristin J. Mack for Defendant Amphenol Corporation. (Mack, Cristin)
July 2, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County, case number 18SL-CC01687, with receipt number 0865-6620456, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Amphenol Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Lemley, Gregg)
July 2, 2018 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen. (BAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mills v. Amphenol Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amphenol Corporation
Represented By: Cristin J. Mack
Represented By: Gregg M. Lemley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James N. Mills
Represented By: Gene J. Brockland, Jr.
Represented By: Brian M. Wacker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor plaintiff: TTM Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Lilian H. Davis
Represented By: Alan S. Breckenridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?