Poston v. St. Louis Art Museum Foundation et al
| Andrea Poston |
| John Doe, St. Louis Art Museum Foundation and John Doe Entity |
| 4:2018cv01130 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Ronnie L White |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, filed by Andrea Poston.(MFG) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Zachary Stephen Merkle for Defendant St. Louis Art Museum Foundation. (Merkle, Zachary) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Narcisa P. Przulj for Defendant St. Louis Art Museum Foundation. (Przulj, Narcisa) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant St. Louis Art Museum Foundation. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Przulj, Narcisa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Removal to Plaintiff: by Defendant St. Louis Art Museum Foundation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Przulj, Narcisa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, case number 1722-CC11959, with receipt number 0865-6634843, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by St. Louis Art Museum Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Przulj, Narcisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
