Lapidus v. CIGNA
Plaintiff: Melanie Lapidus and Life Insurance Company of North America
Defendant: CIGNA
Case Number: 4:2018cv01291
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Audrey G Fleissig
Referring Judge: Jean C Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2018 Filing 9 Defendant LINAs ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by Life Insurance Company of North America.(Boyer, Jamie)
September 19, 2018 Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Jamie L. Boyer for Plaintiff Life Insurance Company of North America. (Boyer, Jamie)
August 29, 2018 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Life Insurance Company of North America,Terminating CIGNA no Summons(es) issued, Waivers issued no, Consents issued no, jury demand, , filed by Melanie Lapidus.(Hoeplinger, Stephen)
August 29, 2018 Filing 6 STIPULATION Regarding First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Melanie Lapidus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hoeplinger, Stephen)
August 10, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Melanie Lapidus. CIGNA served on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. (Farrell, Kelley)
August 9, 2018 Filing 4 REASSIGNMENT ORDER: District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig no longer assigned to case. Case reassigned to District Judge Jean C. Hamilton for all further proceedings. (AFC)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF RECUSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the undersigned United States District Judge is disqualified from handling any matters in this case, and the Clerk of Court shall randomly reassign the case to another judge. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/9/2018. (AFC)
August 6, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE Intent to Use Process Server: by Plaintiff Melanie Lapidus (Farrell, Kelley) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/7/2018: #1 Summons CIGNA Summons) (MFG).
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant CIGNA Life Insurance Company of North America with receipt number 0865-6683078, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Melanie Lapidus. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Farrell, Kelley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lapidus v. CIGNA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CIGNA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melanie Lapidus
Represented By: Kelley Field Farrell
Represented By: Stephen Mark Hoeplinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Life Insurance Company of North America
Represented By: Jamie L. Boyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?