Stokes v. Horan et al
Marvin Stokes |
Sgt Horan and St. Alexis Hospital |
4:2018cv01347 |
August 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Francois |
John A Ross |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Marvin Stokes. (KKS) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Marvin Stokes. (KKS) Address updated in CM/ECF on 9/13/2018 (CAR). |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Aug 17 15:01:25 CDT 2018 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. (DJO) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Marvin Stokes. (DJO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Marvin Stokes. NOTE: NO SIGNATURE PAGE ATTACHED. (DJO) |
Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Sgt Horan, St. Alexis Hospital Jury Demand,, filed by Marvin Stokes. (Attachments: #1 Memoranda in Support, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Judge Assignment Label, #5 Envelope)(DJO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.