Ahmetasevic v. Trans Union LLC et al
Alan Ahmetasevic |
Fortune Financial Corporation, Experian Information Systems, Inc. and Trans Union LLC |
4:2018cv01456 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Alan Ahmetasevic Process Server: Pro-Serve Process Servers (BAK) |
Summons Issued as to defendant Experian Information Systems, Inc., Fortune Financial Corporation, Trans Union LLC. The summons were emailed to attorney Richard Mark Maseles. (BAK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT 4:18-cv-1456 against defendant All Defendants with receipt number 0865-6724101, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Alan Ahmetasevic. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Experian, #3 Summons Fortune Fin. Corp., #4 Summons Trans Union)(Maseles, Richard) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/4/2018: #5 Original Filing Form) (BAK). |
Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey. Summons will issue when Notice of Process Server and Original Filing Form are filed. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.