Mcpherson v. Midland Funding, LLC
| Joseph Mcpherson |
| Midland Funding, LLC |
| 4:2018cv01811 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Having been advised that this action has been settled (Doc. No. #7 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all case deadlines are vacated and the Rule 16 Conference set on December 5, 2018 is canceled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file, within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/13/2018. (CLO)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Midland Funding, LLC (Martin, Thomas) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Scheduling Conference: Scheduling Conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 is set for December 5, 2018, at 11:00 AM in the chambers of the undersigned. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) Joint Scheduling Plan due by 11/28/2018. Rule 16 Conference set for 12/5/2018 11:00 AM in Chambers before District Judge John A. Ross.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/2/2018. (CLO) Modified signature on 11/2/2018 (CLO).
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Midland Funding, LLC.(Martin, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL Circuit Court Docket Sheet. (MFG) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Joseph Mcpherson.(MFG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Midland Funding, LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (Martin, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, case number 18SL-AC26180, Jury Demand,, filed by Midland Funding, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Exhibit B, #3 Original Filing Form)(Martin, Thomas) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. (MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mcpherson v. Midland Funding, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Funding, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Thomas M. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Mcpherson | |
| Represented By: | Richard A. Voytas, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
