Gustafson v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District
| Scott Gustafson |
| Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District |
| 4:2018cv02074 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Charles A Shaw |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to remand [Doc. 20] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 1/29/2019. (MRC)
|
|
Filing 31
Docket Text ORDER re: Doc. #22 , MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Ruling on #20 MOTION to Remand, filed by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson; ORDERED DENIED. The relief requested by Plaintiff was a two-week extension to file a response in opposition to #14 MOTION to Dismiss. This request is now moot as #14 MOTION to Dismiss is fully and timely briefed. The Court will rule on the pending #20 MOTION to Remand before addressing #14 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on January 17, 2019.(LL)
|
| Filing 30 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER "Joint Statement of the Parties" by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Hey, Brian) |
| Filing 29 REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Hey, Brian) |
| Filing 28 REPLY to Response to Motion re #20 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri filed by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (Dashtaki, Cyrus) |
| Filing 27 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #22 MOTION to Stay re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case , #15 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Fennessey, Rex) |
| Filing 26 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #20 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri filed by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Fennessey, Rex) |
| Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (Dashtaki, Cyrus) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District (Acknowledgement of Receipt Of) Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hey, Brian) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District Sent To: State Court - Executed (Hey, Brian) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Stay re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case , #15 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (Dashtaki, Cyrus) |
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #20 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri filed by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Defendant's December 5, 2018 Notice of Additional Authority)(Dashtaki, Cyrus) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (Dashtaki, Cyrus) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than January 16, 2019 the parties shall file with the Court a written joint statement responding to this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to withdraw of plaintiff's attorney Jason Finkes is GRANTED. [Doc. 18] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions filed in state court are DENIED without prejudice. The parties may re-file the motions under the appropriate Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Docs. 7, 9] ( Response to Court due by 1/16/2019.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 1/3/2019. (MRC)
|
|
Filing 17
Docket Text ORDER re: Doc. #16 , Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case, #15 Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson; ORDERED GRANTED. Plaintiff shall respond to the Motion to Dismiss by January 9, 2019. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on December 26, 2018. (SMH)
|
| Filing 16 Consent MOTION for Extension of: Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case, #15 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (Dashtaki, Cyrus) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Hey, Brian) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Hey, Brian) |
| Filing 13 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Charles A. Shaw for all further proceedings (MCB) |
| Filing 12 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by James N. Foster, Jr for Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Foster, James) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Rex P. Fennessey for Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Fennessey, Rex) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Hey, Brian) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. (MFG) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Jason M. Finkes by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. [Clerk's note: Motion filed in State Court] (MRC) |
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and in Opposition to Defendant's motion to Reconsider re #7 Defendant's Notice of Additional Authority and Motion to Reconsider its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's second Amended Petition and MOTION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (MFG) Modified on 12/14/2018 (CBL). |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to #7 Defendant's Notice of Additional Authority and Motion to Reconsider its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's second Amended Petition and MOTION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (MFG) Modified on 12/14/2018 (CBL). |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and/or for Sanctions by Plaintiff Scott Gustafson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(MFG) |
| Filing 8 Third Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, filed by Scott Gustafson.(MFG) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Notice of Additional Authority and Motion to Reconsider its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's second Amended Petition and MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (MFG). (Added MOTION for Protective Order on 12/14/2018) (CBL). |
| Filing 6 Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, filed by Scott Gustafson.(MFG) Modified on 12/13/2018 (MFG). |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, filed by Scott Gustafson.(MFG) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis, case number 1522-CC11361, with receipt number 0865-6923227, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Attachments 1 through 60 to State Court filings, #2 Attachment Attachmennts 61 through 82 to State court filings, #3 Attachment Notice Regarding Pending Motions, #4 Attachment Attachments to Notice Regarding Pending Motions, #5 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Hey, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gustafson v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott Gustafson | |
| Represented By: | Jason M Finkes |
| Represented By: | Cyrus C. Dashtaki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District | |
| Represented By: | Brian C. Hey |
| Represented By: | James N. Foster, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Rex P. Fennessey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
