Clayborn Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, State of Missouri et al
| Jatonya Clayborn-Muldrow and Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow |
| City of St. Louis, Michael A. Deeba, City of St. Louis, State of Missouri and Michael Deeba |
| 4:2018cv02150 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow. . (Hoffman, Megen) |
Filing 11
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2: Standard. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS.] (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 2/19/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 2/26/2019 03:30 PM in Chambers before District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/24/2019. (AFC)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Michael Deeba Amended Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit B-Email)(Silsbe, Alexis) |
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for remand or, in the alternative, order directing Defendants to file an amended notice of removal curing potential jurisdictional defects is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth above. ECF No. #6 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before January 25, 2019, Defendants shall file an amended notice of removal, in accordance with this Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 01/18/2019. (KCB)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to State Court or in Alternative For Order Directing Defendants to File Amended Notice of Removal Curing Jurisdictional Defects filed by Defendants City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Michael Deeba. (Silsbe, Alexis) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Michael Deeba Sent To: Plaintiff (Silsbe, Alexis) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to State Court or in Alternative For Order Directing Defendants to File Amended Notice of Removal Curing Jurisdictional Defects by Plaintiff Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow. (Barry, Richard) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Michael Deeba Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Notice of Removal to Federal Court)(Silsbe, Alexis) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by City of St. Louis, Michael A. Deeba.(Silsbe, Alexis) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig. (JWD) |
| Filing 4 First Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis City Circuit Court, filed by Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow. (Attachments: #1 MCHR Right to Sue Charging Letter)(JWD) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis City Circuit Court, filed by Jatonya Clayborn-Muldrow. (Attachments: #1 MCHR Right to Sue Charging Letter)(JWD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 22nd Judicial Circuit-City of St. Louis State of Missouri, case number 1822-CC11085, with receipt number 0865-6946514, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by City of St. Louis, Michael A. Deeba. (Attachments: #1 State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form Original Filing form)(Silsbe, Alexis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
