Walker v. Federal Express
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Walker
Defendant: Federal Express
Case Number: 4:2019cv00068
Filed: January 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Audrey G Fleissig
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Docket Text ORDER Re: #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Ashley Patterson by Defendant Federal Express; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on March 5, 2019. (SAA)
March 4, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Ashley Patterson. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-7070682) by Defendant Federal Express. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing)(Patterson, Ashley)
February 22, 2019 Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis County Circuit Court filed by Defendant Federal Express. (Rhoten, Katherine)
February 15, 2019 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #6 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis County Circuit Court filed by Plaintiff Roosevelt Walker. (Schaeffer, John)
February 15, 2019 Filing 6 First MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to St. Louis County Circuit Court by Plaintiff Roosevelt Walker. (Schaeffer, John)
January 17, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Federal Express Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rhoten, Katherine)
January 17, 2019 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert L. Ortbals, Jr for Defendant Federal Express. (Ortbals, Robert)
January 17, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to First Amended Complaint by Federal Express.(BAK)
January 17, 2019 Filing 2 First Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Roosevelt Walker.(BAK)
January 17, 2019 Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Direct-Assigned: U.S. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig. Defense counsel notified to file Notice to Plaintiff of Removal. (BAK)
January 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 17SL-CC00895-01, with receipt number 0865-6982343, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Federal Express. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet , #7 Original Filing Form )(Rhoten, Katherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Federal Express
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Walker
Represented By: John Clayton Schaeffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express
Represented By: Katherine M. Rhoten
Represented By: Ashley S. Patterson
Represented By: Robert L. Ortbals, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?