C.J.B.C. et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, The et al
| Chris Collins and C. J.B. C. |
| Renco Holdings, Inc., Jerry Pyatt, Ira L. Rennert, The Renco Group, Inc., Doe Run Resources Corporation, The, Marvin K. Kaiser, D.R. Acquisition Corp., Theodore P. Fox, III and Jeffrey L. Zelms |
| 4:2019cv00477 |
| March 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - [COPY OF ORDER AS ENTERED IN 4:15CV1704 RWS]-.... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiffs in the following cases shall be severed. The Clerk of Court shall open and randomly assign a new case for each Plaintiff (or two related Plaintiffs) using the complaint filed in each case: L.D.A.S. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1924 RWS C.M.A.M. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1927 RWS G.P.A.E. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1933 RWS A.B.A.M. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1934 RWS E.J.H.C. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1935 RWS M.B.H.A. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1936 RWS L.C.A.B. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1940 RWS L.G.A.G. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1948 RWS A.V.A.S. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1957 RWS A.L.A.C. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1959 RWS R.Y.A.P. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 1963 RWS D.J.A.R. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 2001 RWS R.C.S.L. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 2207 RWS K.F.P.R. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:17 CV 2858 RWS A.C.Y.A. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:18 CV 560 RWS A.S.A.T. v. The Doe Run Resources Corp. et al., 4:18 CV 638 RWS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after these cases are severed, each of the severed cases shall be consolidated with this Lead Case before me for all pretrial proceedings. Once the cases are ready for trial, they will be returned to the docket of the judge in this district to whom they were assigned before consolidation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future filings shall be made only in this Lead Case and should only reference the case number of this Lead Case in the caption of the filing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file a copy of this order in each of the cases listed above and in the new severed cases. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/5/19. (MRC)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Doe Run Resources Corporation, The, Theodore P. Fox, III, Marvin K. Kaiser, Jerry Pyatt, Jeffrey L. Zelms.(MRC) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by D.R. Acquisition Corp..(MRC) |
| Filing 2 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis City Circuit Court,filed by Plaintiffs (MRC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, case number 1722-CCO1284, Jury Demand, filed by Renco Holdings, Inc..(Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Part 1 of 2, #2 Exhibit 1 Part 2 of 2, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Original Filing Form, #7 Supplement State Court File Part 1 of 4, #8 Supplement State Court File Part 2 of 4, #9 Supplement State Court File Part 3 of 4, #10 State Court File Part 4 of 4) (MRC) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
