Bowen v. USA
| James Bowen |
| USA |
| 4:2019cv02736 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR MOVANT TO SHOW CAUSE : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall show cause, in writing and no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why the instant 2255 motion should not be dismissed as time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant fails to timely comply with this Order, his 2255 motion will be denied and dismissed as time-barred. ( Show Cause Response due by 1/4/2020.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 12/05/2019. (KCB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Dec 5 14:39:01 CST 2019 (Battle, Kinica)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF #4 Amended Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255/Dorsey) by Petitioner James Bowen. (TMT) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE/SET ASIDE/CORRECT SENTENCE re #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Petitioner James Bowen. (TMT) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send movant a 2255 form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant must complete the form and return it to the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Movant's failure to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on October 30, 2019. (Attachments: #1 MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255)(BRP)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2. Sent to non-electronic party this date. Wed Oct 30 14:27:34 CDT 2019 (Porter, Brittany)
|
| Filing 3 Request for Clarification by Petitioner James Bowen. (BRP) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Oct 9 11:00:39 CDT 2019 (admin,) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION to Remove Impediment by James Bowen construed as MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE (pursuant to docket text order 66 in case no. 4:16cr106 RLW) by Petitioner James Bowen. (DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bowen v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Michael Jones |
| Represented By: | Colleen C. Lang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Bowen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
