Copeland v. Royal Gate Inc.
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Defendant: Royal Gate Inc.
Case Number: 4:2019cv02912
Filed: October 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Royal Gate Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Shank, Brian)
October 25, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Royal Gate Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment State Court File, #2 Attachment Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Attachment Original Filing Form)(Shank, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Copeland v. Royal Gate Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Copeland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Gate Inc.
Represented By: Brian R. Shank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?