Grant v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
Plaintiff: William Lee Grant, II
Defendant: Special Collection Service and Central Intelligence Agency
Case Number: 4:2019cv02969
Filed: October 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nannette A Baker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4-5. Fri Nov 15 13:27:28 CST 2019 (Hency, Christy)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: In accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered herewith,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken ingood faith. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/15/19. (CMH)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [ECF No. 2], IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case 1s dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915( e )(2)(B)(i). A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/15/19. (CMH)
November 6, 2019 Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (CSAW)
November 4, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Nov 4 12:02:03 CST 2019 (admin,)
November 4, 2019 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
November 4, 2019 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. (JWD)
October 29, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff William Lee Grant, II. (JWD)
October 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Central Intelligence Agency, Special Collection Service, Jury Demand, filed by William Lee Grant, II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit in Support of Complaint, #2 Envelope)(JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Lee Grant, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Special Collection Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?