Ponto et al v. Monsanto Company
| Karen Ponto and James V. Ponto |
| Monsanto Company |
| 4:2019cv03127 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***REMARK - Case transferred from Missouri Eastern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:20-cv-00033, filed 01/02/2020. (DLB) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER to: Northern District of California. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction.(DLB)
|
| Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-175) regarding multidistrict litigation by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel. (DLB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Monsanto Company with receipt number AMOEDC-7597150, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Karen Ponto, James V. Ponto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Waiver of Service , #4 Waiver of Service Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons)(McGreevy, Joe) |
| Case Opening Notification: Waivers issued 1. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
