Roach et al v. Walters et al
| Ashley Roach, T.R., Michael Roach and G.R. |
| Brayden Walters and Bradley Walters |
| 4:2019cv03405 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Southeastern Division is 1:20cv2 SNLJ. (BAK) |
| Filing 5 SEALED DOCUMENT - Unredacted Complaint . (BAK) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Next Friend as to T.R. ; relationship to minor:Father by Plaintiff Michael Roach. (BAK) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Next Friend as to G.R. ; relationship to minor:Father by Plaintiff Michael Roach. (BAK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs G.R., Ashley Roach, Michael Roach, T.R. Process Server: SEMO Process Service (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-7663440, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Tymber Roach, Ashley Roach, Gage Roach, Michael Roach. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Process Server, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Summons Bradley Walters, #5 Summons Brayden Walters)(Rich, Thomas) Modified on 1/2/2020 (BAK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
