Pennington et al v. Visbal
| Edward D. Jones & Co., L. P. and Penny Pennington |
| Kristen Visbal |
| 4:2019mc00873 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Miscellaneous Case |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. All matters having been resolved, the Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/20/2019. (AFC)
|
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT JOINT by Edward D. Jones & Co., L. P., Penny Pennington. (Rehmann, John) |
| Filing 9 STATUS REPORT JOINT by Edward D. Jones & Co., L. P., Penny Pennington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rehmann, John) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER. Following a telephone conference held with counsel on November 15, 2019, and for the reasons discussed during the telephone conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than November 18, 2019, the parties shall file a status report advising the Court as to whether the parties have reached any agreement regarding the motion to quash (ECF No. 1) and what, if any, issues remain for ruling. (Status Report due by 11/18/2019.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/15/19. (EAB)
|
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #1 MOTION to Quash with receipt number AMOEDC-7573944, in the amount of $47 filed by Movants Edward D. Jones & Co., L. P., Penny Pennington. (Rehmann, John) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Quash with receipt number AMOEDC-7573944, in the amount of $47 filed by Respondent Kristen Visbal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 19, #19 Exhibit 20, #20 Exhibit 21, #21 Exhibit 22, #22 Exhibit 23, #23 Exhibit 24, #24 Exhibit 25)(Guymon, Kayden) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Hearing re #1 MOTION to Quash with receipt number AMOEDC-7573944, in the amount of $47 filed by Respondent Kristen Visbal. (Guymon, Kayden) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Kristen Visbal shall file a response to the pending motions (ECF Nos. 1 & 2) no later than November 14, 2019. After reviewing the response, the Court will determine whether to hold a hearing in this matter. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on November 12, 2019. (MCB)
|
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Philip Allen Cantwell for Movants Edward D. Jones & Co., L. P., Penny Pennington. (Cantwell, Philip) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/12/2019 to correct PDF error) (JWD). Modified on 11/12/2019 (JWD). |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Hearing re #1 MOTION to Quash with receipt number AMOEDC-7573944, in the amount of $47 by Movants Edward D. Jones & Co., L. P., Penny Pennington. (Rehmann, John) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash with receipt number AMOEDC-7573944, in the amount of $47, filed by Penny Pennington, Edward D. Jones & Co., L. P.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A - Kavaler Declaraton + Exhibits, #2 Attachment B - Rehmann Declaration + Exhibits)(Rehmann, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
