Glaze v. Proffer Wholesale Produce, Inc et al
| Jared Glaze |
| Proffer Wholesale Produce, Inc. and Lacey Walker |
| 4:2020cv00045 |
| January 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Jean C Hamilton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Proffer Wholesale Produce, Inc., Lacey Walker.(O'Toole, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jared Glaze Proffer Wholesale Produce, Inc. waiver signed on 1/24/2020, answer due 3/24/2020; Lacey Walker waiver signed on 1/24/2020, answer due 3/24/2020. (Reinberg, Stephen) |
| Case Opening Notification: Waivers issued: 1 All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Proffer Wholesale Produce, Inc., Lacey Walker with receipt number AMOEDC-7683562, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Jared Glaze. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reinberg, Stephen) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2020: #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Waiver of Service) (JWD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
