ERB Legal Investments, LLC v. Quintessa Marketing, LLC
Plaintiff: ERB Legal Investments, LLC
Defendant: Quintessa Marketing, LLC
Case Number: 4:2020cv01255
Filed: September 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: David D Noce
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 12:2615
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2020 Filing 9 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ)
September 15, 2020 Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Joseph Neely for Defendant Quintessa Marketing, LLC. (Neely, Joseph)
September 15, 2020 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by W. Dudley McCarter, III for Defendant Quintessa Marketing, LLC. (McCarter, W.)
September 15, 2020 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by John P. Torbitzky for Defendant Quintessa Marketing, LLC. (Torbitzky, John)
September 15, 2020 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. (BAK)
September 15, 2020 Filing 5 Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, filed by ERB Legal Investments, LLC.(BAK)
September 15, 2020 Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St. Louis, filed by ERB Legal Investments, LLC.(BAK)
September 15, 2020 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Quintessa Marketing, LLC.. (Torbitzky, John)
September 15, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Quintessa Marketing, LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (Torbitzky, John)
September 15, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis City Circuit Court, case number 2022-CC09383, with receipt number AMOEDC-8144773, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Quintessa Marketing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Petition, #2 Exhibit Amended Petition, #3 Exhibit Complete File from State Court with Docket Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Torbitzky, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ERB Legal Investments, LLC v. Quintessa Marketing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quintessa Marketing, LLC
Represented By: Joseph Neely
Represented By: John P. Torbitzky
Represented By: W. Dudley McCarter, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERB Legal Investments, LLC
Represented By: Edward Ryan Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?