Lewis v. Watlow Electric Manufacturing Co. et al
| Charles G. Lewis |
| Mike Duke, Starletta Drayton, Christopher Menly, Ron Loper, Chris Harrison, Jake Anderson, Jamie Mitchell, Christine Machalek, Angel Farley, Greg Genseh, Watlow Electric Manufacturing Co., Diane Cox, Executive Dining LLC, Sherri Daniel, Eric Chan, Bryan Quinn, Andrew Darr and Burnetta Thomas |
| 4:2020cv01261 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM for Evidentiary Hearing by Plaintiff Charles G. Lewis. (ARL) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE Right to Sue Letter: by Plaintiff Charles G. Lewis (ARL) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Executive Dining's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Plaintiff Charles G. Lewis. (ARL) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance: by Plaintiff Charles G. Lewis. (ARL) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Executive Dining's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Memorandum In Support of Defendant Executive Dining, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Executive Dining LLC. (Kinsella, Carrie) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Executive Dining's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Executive Dining LLC. (Kinsella, Carrie) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Carrie L. Kinsella for Defendant Executive Dining LLC. (Kinsella, Carrie) |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Executive Dining LLC. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Marble, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Executive Dining LLC Sent To: State Court - Executed (Marble, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 9/27/2020. (KEK) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet. (MFG) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by Charles G. Lewis.(MFG) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (MFG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Executive Dining LLC Notice of Plaintiff of Removal Sent To: Plaintiff (Marble, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 20SL-CC03144, with receipt number AMOEDC-8146184, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Executive Dining LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Marble, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
