United States of America v. $92,865.00 U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| $92,865.00 U.S. Currency |
| 4:2020cv01770 |
| December 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DECLARATION filed by Plaintiff United States of America of Public Notification. (Casey, Stephen) |
Filing 5
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER. (See Full Document) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT a portion of the defendant currency in the amount of Fifty-Five Thousand, Seven Hundred Nineteen Dollars ($55,719.00), and any accumulated interest earned on the defendant property while held in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, shall be forfeited to the United States of America to be disposed of according to law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a portion of the defendant currency in the amount of Thirty-Seven Thousand, One Hundred Forty-Six Dollars ($37,146.00), less any debt owed to the United States, any agency of the United States, or any other debt in which the United States is authorized to collect pursuant to the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1966, Title 31, United States Code, Section 3716 and other programs such as the Treasury Offset Program, shall be returned to Claimant Dakota Smith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT each party shall bear its own costs incurred in this action. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/14/2021. (CBL)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Judgment of Forfeiture by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Casey, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 MARSHAL Return $92,865.00 U.S. Currency party served William Ekiss, Type of return Complaint and Notice, (SMM) |
| Filing 2 MARSHAL Return Executed party served$92,865.00 U.S. Currency, 4/22/2020- USMS Custody; 12/15/2020- Complaint and Warrant Served on Asset. (CLO) |
| Forfeiture Warrant Issued as to defendant $92,865.00 U.S. Currency. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. (BAK) |
| Judge Clark enters a Standing Order in all of his cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/stephen-r-clark (JAB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Forfeiture against defendant $92,865.00 U.S. Currency Non-Jury Demand,, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Warrant)(Casey, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. $92,865.00 U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $92,865.00 U.S. Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Stephen R. Casey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
