Stewart v. USA
Donald Stewart |
USA |
4:2020cv01880 |
December 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Catherine D Perry |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - TRACK 4: 2255 MOTION TO VACATE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case has been assigned to Track 4 (Administrative). Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant motion to vacate should not be granted. (Show Cause Response due by 4/5/2021.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 02/19/2021. (ANP) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's (Pro se) Motion for Leave of Court Respectfully Requesting for a Sixty (60) Days Extension of Time to File a Rule 15(c) Motion in Support of the Accompanied 2255 Pursuant to Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S 644 (2005), due to the Dangerous Deadly Spread Nationwide of the COVID-19 Virus (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's (Pro se) Motion for Leave of Court Respectfully Requesting that it Grant and Issue Three (3) Different Types of ORDERS in the Best Interest of Justice (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 02/19/2021. (ANP) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4, 5. Fri Feb 19 11:47:54 CST 2021 (Petri, Alexis) |
Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION for Leave of Court Respectfully Requesting that It "Grant and Issue" Three (3) Different Types of "Orders" in the Best Interest of Justice by Petitioner Donald Stewart. (ANP) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Dec 30 09:01:18 CST 2020 (admin,) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. (DLB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave of Court for a sixty (60) day extension of time to file a Rule 15(c) Motion in support of the accompanied 2255 due to the dangerous deadly spread of the COVID 19 Virus. by Petitioner Donald Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DLB) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by Petitioner Donald Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stewart v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Michael A. Reilly |
Represented By: | James C. Delworth |
Represented By: | Angie E. Danis |
Represented By: | Tiffany G. Becker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Donald Stewart | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.