Benford v. Missouri Division of Employment Security
Plaintiff: Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant: Missouri Division of Employment Security
Case Number: 4:2022cv00056
Filed: January 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Welby
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/19/2022. (AFO)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in the district court without prepaying fees or costs is GRANTED. [ECF No. #2 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendant Missouri Division of Employment Security are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot. [ECF No. #3 ] An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/19/2022. (AFO)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Mailed to non-electronic party this date. Wed Jan 19 16:15:20 CST 2022 (Ojolola, Abby)
January 14, 2022 Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
January 14, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Jan 14 12:02:18 CST 2022 (admin,)
January 14, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JKL)
January 14, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JKL)
January 13, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford. (JKL)
January 13, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford. (JKL)
January 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford Jury Demand,, filed by Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form)(JKL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benford v. Missouri Division of Employment Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Division of Employment Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?