Rose v. Schulte
| Keith Rose |
| Robert Schulte |
| 4:2022cv00099 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John M Bodenhausen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Keith Rose, Defendant Robert Schulte. (ANP) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Defendant Robert Schulte to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 3/28/2022. (ANP) |
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's MOTION to Continue to answer or otherwise plead (Doc. #7 ) is GRANTED. Robert Schulte answer due 4/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 3/1/22. (SGP)
|
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Andrea Staci Alper for Defendant Robert Schulte. (Alper, Andrea) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Continue to answer or otherwise plead by Defendant Robert Schulte. (Merklin von Kaenel, Lorena) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Lorena V. Merklin von Kaenel for Defendant Robert Schulte. (Merklin von Kaenel, Lorena) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Jessie M. Steffan for Plaintiff Keith Rose. (Steffan, Jessie) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Keith Rose. Robert Schulte served on 2/7/2022, answer due 2/28/2022. (Rothert, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Keith Rose Process Server: Tim Moore/Pro-Serve (Rothert, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Robert Schulte with receipt number AMOEDC-9093334, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Keith Rose. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons)(Rothert, Anthony) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Anthony E. Rothert. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rose v. Schulte | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keith Rose | |
| Represented By: | Anthony E. Rothert |
| Represented By: | Jessie M. Steffan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Schulte | |
| Represented By: | Lorena V. Merklin von Kaenel |
| Represented By: | Andrea Staci Alper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
