Davis et al v. United States of America et al
| Sarah Davis, Tyler Davis, E. D., G. D., T. D. and V. D. |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Postal Service |
| 4:2022cv00535 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney W Sippel |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Sarah Davis's motion for appointment as next friend of Plaintiffs E.D., G.D., T.D., and V.D., #2 , is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 5/19/2022. (KEK)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Next Friend as to E.D, G.D., T.D., V.D. ; relationship to minor:mother by Plaintiff Sarah Davis. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel. 4 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney R. Tyson Mutrux. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-9294318, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by G. D., T. D., Tyler Davis, V. D., Sarah Davis, E. D.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons - USA - SERVICE TO AG, #4 Summons - USA - SERVICE ON US ATTY, #5 Summons - USPS - SERVICE ON US ATTY, #6 Summons - USPS - SERVICE TO AG, #7 Form PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEXT FRIEND)(Mutrux, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
