Williams v. United States of America
Petitioner: Dorian Williams
Respondent: J. E. Krueger and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 4:2022cv00734
Filed: July 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Henry Edward Autrey
Referring Judge: Sarah E Pitlyk
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER of USCA as to #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Dorian Williams. USCA Appeal #: 22-2740. If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, pre-sentence report (3 copies), exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. (HMA)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Initial Notification from USCA for #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Dorian Williams USCA Appeal Number: 22-2740. (HMA)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #4 Memorandum & Order,,. Notice of Appeal filed on 8/17/2022 by Petitioner Dorian Williams. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JBH)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 11. Order sent to party not electronically notified this date. Wed Aug 17 07:51:16 CDT 2022 (Long, Carol)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Memorandum & Order by Petitioner Dorian Williams. (CBL)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court docket Petitioner's Application for Issuance of Certificate of Appealability as a Notice of Appeal and transmit the record to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/16/2022. (JEB)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Docket Text ORDER: The Court hereby VACATES docket text order #9. This document was intended for Court of Appeals. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/9/2022. (CBL)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ***VACATED PER Docket Text Order # 10 on 8/9/2022.*** Docket Text ORDER: Re: #7 Application for Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability filed by Petitioner Dorian Williams; ORDERED DENIED AS MOOT PURSUANT TO THE OPINION AND ORDER DATED JULY 14, 2022. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/4/2022. (HMA) Modified on 8/9/2022 (CBL).
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #6 Petitioner's Request for Certificate of Appealability filed by Petitioner Dorian Williams; ORDERED DENIED AS MOOT PURSUANT TO THE OPINION AND ORDER DATED JULY 14, 2022. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/4/2022. (HMA)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8, 9. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Thu Aug 4 11:18:11 CDT 2022 (Aubuchon, Heather)
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Application for Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability by Petitioner Dorian Williams. (JEB) (Document docketed in error. Document sent to Court of Appeals on 8/9/2022.) (CBL).
August 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Petitioner's Request for Certificate of Appealability by Petitioner Dorian Williams. (JEB)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4, 5. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Fri Jul 15 11:13:41 CDT 2022 (Bailey, Jennifer)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movants motion to vacate, set aside or correct illegal sentence brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/14/2022. (JEB)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence [ECF No. #1 ] is DENIED AND DISMISSED as SUCCESSIVE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. #2 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/14/2022. (JEB)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER On July 12, 2022, this cause was randomly assigned to the Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Because it appears that Petitioner is seeking to attack his judgment and sentence in United States v. Williams, No. 4:10-CR-194-HEA (E.D.Mo), the Court finds that this matter should be construed as one brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 and reassigned to the presiding trial judge, the Honorable Henry Edward Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 7/14/2022. (KXS)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. Thu Jul 14 11:33:04 CDT 2022 (Spurgeon, Katherine)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (DLB)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jul 12 10:00:59 CDT 2022 (admin,)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Dorian Williams. (DLB)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Document worded "HABEAS CORPUS AD SUBJICIENDUM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1651" construed as PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Petitioner Dorian Williams. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, #2 Envelope)(DLB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dorian Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. E. Krueger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?