Baldwin et al v. Panera, LLC
Matthew Baldwin and Samantha Baldwin |
Panera, LLC |
4:2024cv00848 |
June 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Matthew T Schelp |
P.I.: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1396 - Tort Negligence |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Matthew Baldwin, Samantha Baldwin. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Barthle, Patrick) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #12 Disclosure Statement filed by Defendant Panera, LLC. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Party filed the Disclosure Statement in this action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C.1332(a) but failed to properly complete the Court adopted form with diversity information. Non-individuals must include the state of incorporation/formation and state of primary business practice in Section 2 (See FRCP 7.1). LLCs, LLPs must include all members, sub-members, general and limited partners, and corporations and his/her/its state of citizenship (see above) in Section 2. These entities must be entered into CM/ECF where prompted. An amended Disclosure Statement must be filed immediately, using the Court adopted form. # (moed-0001.pdf). (CBL) |
Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Panera, LLC, JAB Holding Company.. (Kavouras, Daniel) |
Filing 11 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiffs Matthew Baldwin, Samantha Baldwin, Defendant Panera, LLC - SECOND NOTICE. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (TMT) |
Filing 10 ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time, Doc. #9 , is GRANTED in part. If the Sanchez Court denies the Motion to Consolidate, Defendant shall have twenty-one (21) days after that denial to file "its answer or responsive pleading" in this matter. If the Sanchez Court grants the Motion to Consolidate, Defendant shall have the amount of time prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file its required response to any consolidated complaint, unless otherwise ordered by the Sanchez Court. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 07/18/2024. (KCD) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Panera, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kavouras, Daniel) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Samantha Baldwin, Matthew Baldwin. Panera, LLC served on 6/26/2024, answer due 7/17/2024. (Barthle, Patrick) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2024: #1 Attachment Original Summons Issued) (TMT). |
Filing 7 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure Statement to Plaintiffs Matthew Baldwin, Samantha Baldwin. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible and add all individuals and entities into CM/ECF as required # (moed-0001.pdf). (TMT) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing of Motion to consolidated by Plaintiffs Matthew Baldwin, Samantha Baldwin with case number 4:24-cv-00847, 4:24-cv-00849, 4:24-cv-00850, 4:24-cv-00857, 4:24-cv-00864 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Barthle, Patrick) |
Filing 5 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Patrick A. Barthle, II filed by Samantha Baldwin, Matthew Baldwin; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 6/20/2024. (KXS) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Patrick A. Barthle, II. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-10669434) by Plaintiffs Matthew Baldwin, Samantha Baldwin. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Barthle, Patrick) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Matthew Baldwin, Samantha Baldwin Process Server: Rufus Harmon; Harmon Legal Process Service (French, James) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney James Matthew French. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, Complaint Ex 1 (CA sample notice) by Plaintiffs Matthew Baldwin, Samantha Baldwin. (French, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Samantha Baldwin et al. against defendant Panera, LLC with receipt number AMOEDC-10667560, in the amount of $405 Jury Demand,, filed by Samantha Baldwin, Matthew Baldwin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons) (French, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.